Court Declares Psystar “Admitted Counterfeit” in Mac OS X Copyright Infringement Case, Apple Wins Summary Judgement – Highlights

Monday, November 16, 2009
By OP Editor

« Next »

Continued from first Page of Apple vs Psystar, detailed court findings

Psystar vs Apple, Court Determines: Psystar Admitted Counterfeit

Trademark Infringement or Fair Use?

Psystar uses Apple’s trademark “Mac” as part of its product name “OpenMac.” Psystar stopping using OpenMac as product name, now they use “Open[fill this in] with Mac OS X” instead. They still use Apple’s trademark, so they are hit with Trademark infringement.

Psystar responded to the trademark infringement portion of the case by claiming “use of Apple’s trademarks and trade dress is a nominative fair use.”

The court rejects Psystar’s argument based on Psystar’s “motion never fully addresses this issue.” [p15 5-6] “The burden of proof was not met by Psystar’s motion. ‘Accordingly, Psystar’s motion for summary judgment on nominative fair use must be denied’.” [p15 10-11]

Continue reading using the navigation elements on top or on the bottom of the page…


« Next »

Related Posts

  1. Microsoft Lost Intellectual Property Infringement Case in Chinese Court, Versions of Windows Banned in China
  2. Judge Rejects Google Arguments to Dismiss Oracle Copyright Claims
  3. Queens Fake Apple Stores Hand Over Counterfeit Goods in Settlement
  4. Apple Wins Injunction: Australian Court Bans Samsung Android Galaxy Tablet
  5. Counterfeit Cut the Rope BlackBerry Game Developer Aztux Threatens to Sue OP

Tags: Analysis, Apple, Counterfeit, Fail, Legal, Mac

Site Search

iPad Air 2 Case

Popular Tags